中文字幕日韩在线观看,久久久人人玩人妻精品综合,国产欧美日本在线,久久精品免费视频6,欧美精品黄色网站,色综合久久久久无码专区,亚洲区欧美中文字幕久久,国产手机在线视频,国产中文字幕视频在线观看,日本一区二区免费在线观看

Hotline:400-880-1556

English




Notice! IECEE International Electrotechnical Commission issued a number of interim resolutions on battery CTL

Author:中認(rèn)聯(lián)科 time:2021-09-29 Ctr:1652

On September 14, 2021, the IECEE International Electrotechnical Commission announced the latest CTL agreement on batteries. The three battery CTL interim resolutions released this time are as follows:

01 CTL Interim Resolution

PDSH 2182: Charging cut-off current

PDSH 2182.png

Question: According to IEC 62133-2:2017 clause 7.1.2, the second charging procedure prepared for the test project requires a charging cut-off current of 0.05 It A. When the battery manufacturer defines different charging cut-off currents, which cut-off battery should be used to set the charging conditions?

Answer: 0.05It A should continue to be used.

However, according to the manufacturer's requirements, a set of separate tests can be performed on samples prepared using the manufacturer's defined cut-off current for reference. When charging with the cut-off current specified by the manufacturer, the upper limit voltage of the battery must not be exceeded.

explain:

The charge cut-off current has a great probability of affecting the charging state of the sample and the compliance of the test. Therefore, the value 0.05ItA defined in the standard should be strictly followed. On the other hand, considering that the charge cut-off current designed by the battery manufacturer for its products may be different to reflect the expected use conditions, it is allowed to set separately except for 0.05 ItA. The test of the charge cut-off current is for reference only. According to section 7.1.2, the upper limit voltage of the battery must not be exceeded, regardless of the charge cut-off current value.

02 CTL Interim Resolution

PDSH 2161: Sample

PDSH 2161.png

Question: According to IEC 62133:2012, IEC 62133-1:2017, IEC 62133-2:2017 Clause 6, when evaluating batteries (packs), does the battery cell manufacturing time in the samples require no more than six months?

Answer: Not required.

explain:

IEC SC21A WG4 confirmed that it plans to delete the sample requirement six months ago in the next edition of IEC 62133-2.

Related topics:

Q1: If the battery cell has not been tested separately, it will be sent together with the battery (pack) for evaluation and CB certification. In this case, can the battery manufacturing time be exempted?

A: In this case, a separate full set of tests are required for the batteries, which is suitable for the requirement that the manufacturing time of the batteries cannot exceed six months.

Q2: What needs to be paid attention to when applying for CB certification for battery (package) manufacturers in cross-border supply chains?

A: The cycle of designing and producing batteries (packs) using cross-border purchased batteries may be longer. When the batteries (packs) are made, the battery manufacturing time may have exceeded six months. It is recommended that the cell manufacturer complete the CB certification in advance and provide cell samples and CB certificates. When the battery (pack) manufacturer subsequently performs the battery (pack) CB certification, it does not need to consider the issue of the cell manufacturing time exceeding six months.

Q3: The battery (pack) that has obtained the CB certificate and report needs to be forwarded to other mark certification based on the CB certificate and report. Is the (temporary) decision also accepted?

A: Based on the existing CB certificate and report transfer, it is based on the acceptance of the IEC standard and its CTL (temporary) resolution. However, it is not ruled out that the issuing agencies of different countries or regions have differentiated practices or requirements to issue their own marks.

Q4: Regarding the content of this interim resolution, will you consider directly revising the standard in the future?

A: The IEC SC21A working group WG4 plans to cancel the six-month sample requirement in the next edition of the 1.1 edition of IEC 62133-2.

03 CTL Interim Resolution

PDSH 1037A: Selection of series battery samples

PDSH 1037A.png

Sampling principles for battery series testing:

This interim resolution expanded the battery standards applicable to the original resolution (No. DSH 1037) to include IEC 62133:2002, IEC 62133:2012, IEC 62133-1:2017, IEC 62133-2:2017, IEC 62619:2017 and IEC 62660 -3:2016. In order to facilitate a better understanding, some text adjustments have been made to the content of this resolution.

Question: If a series of batteries of the same size, chemical system, voltage, and capacity are produced by the same manufacturer, if the safety compliance of the entire series is to be verified, which model should be selected for testing?

Answer: In the above example, when the total capacity difference exceeds 20%, start from the highest capacity and calculate the capacity value with an amount lower than 20% of this value. Select those models in the series whose capacity is closest to the calculated value for testing. If the total capacity difference of a series of batteries does not exceed 20%, select the lowest, highest and closest model in the middle of the series for testing. Changes that may cause any test failure shall be considered as new models and shall be subjected to the required tests.

explain:

The type of change that may be considered different from the test type, which may cause any test results to fail, which may include but is not limited to:

(a) The material of the positive electrode, negative electrode, separator or electrolyte has changed;

(b) Changes in protection devices, including hardware and software;

(c) Changes in the safety design of battery cells or battery packs, such as exhaust valves;

(d) Changes in the number of cells that make up; and

(e) The change of the connection mode of the battery cell assembly.

Related topics:

Q1: In response to the requirements of different OEMs, manufacturers need to design soft-packed and square-shaped hard-shell batteries, and their electrical parameters are exactly the same. Can they be tested and certified as a single model or series?

A: Considering that the physical structure of the soft case and the square hard case battery is quite different, and the difference directly affects the related test results and judgments, it needs to be considered as two independent battery projects.

Q2: When there are differences in specific aspects, the battery cannot be tested and certified as a single model or series?

A: The original resolution (No. DSH 1037) standardizes the specific sampling principles. At the same time, it standardizes the main factors that affect the series judgment. If there are the following differences, they are generally not treated as series:

(1) Difference in size

(2) Differences in chemical substances

(3) Difference in voltage

(4) Differences in materials of positive electrode, negative electrode, separator or electrolyte

(5) Differences in protection devices, including hardware and software

(6) Safety design differences of batteries or batteries, such as bleed valves

(7) Cells in series and parallel connection and their number differences, or

(8) Differences in battery cell connection methods.

Based on the strictness of the above specifications and the dangerousness of the battery, during actual testing and certification, the battery is basically a single model.

Related terms:

IECEE  International Electrotechnical Commission Conformity Assessment Scheme System

NCB  National Certification Body

IEC SC21A  IEC Battery Technical Committee

WG4  IEC Battery Technical Committee Portable Battery Working Group

CTL  Testing Laboratory Committee

ETF13  Battery Expert Working Group

DSH  resolution

PDSH  Interim Resolution

Reminder

Under certain specific circumstances, the IEC standard needs to make necessary elaboration, specification or further clarification, and form a CTL (temporary) resolution when necessary. It is recommended that you fully understand and implement the battery IEC standard and CTL (temporary) resolution based on the above discussion.

ZRLK has focused on battery product testing and certification for 15 years, always paying attention to changes in national laws and regulations, and providing customers with one-stop testing and certification services to ensure that your products quickly enter the target market. If you have batteries and battery-containing consumer smart products that need to be tested and certified, please feel free to contact us, our engineers will serve you as soon as possible!

Related Articles
  • Big News! GB 26572-2025 Released: China RoHS Upgrades to a Mandatory Standard, Implementation Begins in August 2027

  • India's electronic products usher in a new safety standard: IS/IEC 62368-1:2023 will soon replace the old standard

  • Attention! The fourth edition of UL 62368-1 has been released, and enterprises need to respond in time!

  • CCC Certification: The "Safety Certificate" for Polymer Batteries to Enter the Market in Compliance

Follow Us
无码va在线观看| 99re这里只有精品66| 欧美日韩不卡合集视频| 国产性色强伦免费视频| 国产内射老熟女aaaa∵| 亚洲av成人片无码网站| 精品国产a∨无码一区二区三区 | 成人三级在线视频| 亚洲欧美成人另类激情久久影院| 亚洲国产精品无码久久一区二区分 | 精品亚洲成A人在线观看| H无码精品3D动漫在线观看| 亚洲人成网站在线播放942 | 一道久在线无码加勒比| AV片亚洲国产男人的天堂| 专干老熟妇女视频| 国产在线精品二区| 亚洲av无码乱码在线观看野外| 久久精品国产99国产精品澳门| 最近中文2019字幕第二页| 99精品国产兔费观看久久99 | 99久久精品囯产99久久久蜜月| 五月丁香在线观看| 亚洲日韩av无码| 中文字幕一区二区三区乱码| 无人在线视频观看免费 | 一道久在线无码加勒比| 无遮挡又黄又刺激的视频 | 亚洲AV永久无码精品成人| 国产精品高清一区二区三区| 中文区中文字幕免费看| 久久精品娱乐亚洲领先| 国产一区二区在线视频| 免费看裸体美女脱了衣服露视频胸| 无码无套少妇毛多18pxxxx| 亚洲av无码成人精品国产| 久久99国产精品二区| 韩日午夜在线资源一区二区| 久久国产精品成人免费古装| 99爱国产精品免费高清在线观看| 亚洲国产精品无码专区影院|