中文字幕日韩在线观看,久久久人人玩人妻精品综合,国产欧美日本在线,久久精品免费视频6,欧美精品黄色网站,色综合久久久久无码专区,亚洲区欧美中文字幕久久,国产手机在线视频,国产中文字幕视频在线观看,日本一区二区免费在线观看

Hotline:400-880-1556

English




Notice! IECEE International Electrotechnical Commission issued a number of interim resolutions on battery CTL

Author:中認(rèn)聯(lián)科 time:2021-09-29 Ctr:1152

On September 14, 2021, the IECEE International Electrotechnical Commission announced the latest CTL agreement on batteries. The three battery CTL interim resolutions released this time are as follows:

01 CTL Interim Resolution

PDSH 2182: Charging cut-off current

PDSH 2182.png

Question: According to IEC 62133-2:2017 clause 7.1.2, the second charging procedure prepared for the test project requires a charging cut-off current of 0.05 It A. When the battery manufacturer defines different charging cut-off currents, which cut-off battery should be used to set the charging conditions?

Answer: 0.05It A should continue to be used.

However, according to the manufacturer's requirements, a set of separate tests can be performed on samples prepared using the manufacturer's defined cut-off current for reference. When charging with the cut-off current specified by the manufacturer, the upper limit voltage of the battery must not be exceeded.

explain:

The charge cut-off current has a great probability of affecting the charging state of the sample and the compliance of the test. Therefore, the value 0.05ItA defined in the standard should be strictly followed. On the other hand, considering that the charge cut-off current designed by the battery manufacturer for its products may be different to reflect the expected use conditions, it is allowed to set separately except for 0.05 ItA. The test of the charge cut-off current is for reference only. According to section 7.1.2, the upper limit voltage of the battery must not be exceeded, regardless of the charge cut-off current value.

02 CTL Interim Resolution

PDSH 2161: Sample

PDSH 2161.png

Question: According to IEC 62133:2012, IEC 62133-1:2017, IEC 62133-2:2017 Clause 6, when evaluating batteries (packs), does the battery cell manufacturing time in the samples require no more than six months?

Answer: Not required.

explain:

IEC SC21A WG4 confirmed that it plans to delete the sample requirement six months ago in the next edition of IEC 62133-2.

Related topics:

Q1: If the battery cell has not been tested separately, it will be sent together with the battery (pack) for evaluation and CB certification. In this case, can the battery manufacturing time be exempted?

A: In this case, a separate full set of tests are required for the batteries, which is suitable for the requirement that the manufacturing time of the batteries cannot exceed six months.

Q2: What needs to be paid attention to when applying for CB certification for battery (package) manufacturers in cross-border supply chains?

A: The cycle of designing and producing batteries (packs) using cross-border purchased batteries may be longer. When the batteries (packs) are made, the battery manufacturing time may have exceeded six months. It is recommended that the cell manufacturer complete the CB certification in advance and provide cell samples and CB certificates. When the battery (pack) manufacturer subsequently performs the battery (pack) CB certification, it does not need to consider the issue of the cell manufacturing time exceeding six months.

Q3: The battery (pack) that has obtained the CB certificate and report needs to be forwarded to other mark certification based on the CB certificate and report. Is the (temporary) decision also accepted?

A: Based on the existing CB certificate and report transfer, it is based on the acceptance of the IEC standard and its CTL (temporary) resolution. However, it is not ruled out that the issuing agencies of different countries or regions have differentiated practices or requirements to issue their own marks.

Q4: Regarding the content of this interim resolution, will you consider directly revising the standard in the future?

A: The IEC SC21A working group WG4 plans to cancel the six-month sample requirement in the next edition of the 1.1 edition of IEC 62133-2.

03 CTL Interim Resolution

PDSH 1037A: Selection of series battery samples

PDSH 1037A.png

Sampling principles for battery series testing:

This interim resolution expanded the battery standards applicable to the original resolution (No. DSH 1037) to include IEC 62133:2002, IEC 62133:2012, IEC 62133-1:2017, IEC 62133-2:2017, IEC 62619:2017 and IEC 62660 -3:2016. In order to facilitate a better understanding, some text adjustments have been made to the content of this resolution.

Question: If a series of batteries of the same size, chemical system, voltage, and capacity are produced by the same manufacturer, if the safety compliance of the entire series is to be verified, which model should be selected for testing?

Answer: In the above example, when the total capacity difference exceeds 20%, start from the highest capacity and calculate the capacity value with an amount lower than 20% of this value. Select those models in the series whose capacity is closest to the calculated value for testing. If the total capacity difference of a series of batteries does not exceed 20%, select the lowest, highest and closest model in the middle of the series for testing. Changes that may cause any test failure shall be considered as new models and shall be subjected to the required tests.

explain:

The type of change that may be considered different from the test type, which may cause any test results to fail, which may include but is not limited to:

(a) The material of the positive electrode, negative electrode, separator or electrolyte has changed;

(b) Changes in protection devices, including hardware and software;

(c) Changes in the safety design of battery cells or battery packs, such as exhaust valves;

(d) Changes in the number of cells that make up; and

(e) The change of the connection mode of the battery cell assembly.

Related topics:

Q1: In response to the requirements of different OEMs, manufacturers need to design soft-packed and square-shaped hard-shell batteries, and their electrical parameters are exactly the same. Can they be tested and certified as a single model or series?

A: Considering that the physical structure of the soft case and the square hard case battery is quite different, and the difference directly affects the related test results and judgments, it needs to be considered as two independent battery projects.

Q2: When there are differences in specific aspects, the battery cannot be tested and certified as a single model or series?

A: The original resolution (No. DSH 1037) standardizes the specific sampling principles. At the same time, it standardizes the main factors that affect the series judgment. If there are the following differences, they are generally not treated as series:

(1) Difference in size

(2) Differences in chemical substances

(3) Difference in voltage

(4) Differences in materials of positive electrode, negative electrode, separator or electrolyte

(5) Differences in protection devices, including hardware and software

(6) Safety design differences of batteries or batteries, such as bleed valves

(7) Cells in series and parallel connection and their number differences, or

(8) Differences in battery cell connection methods.

Based on the strictness of the above specifications and the dangerousness of the battery, during actual testing and certification, the battery is basically a single model.

Related terms:

IECEE  International Electrotechnical Commission Conformity Assessment Scheme System

NCB  National Certification Body

IEC SC21A  IEC Battery Technical Committee

WG4  IEC Battery Technical Committee Portable Battery Working Group

CTL  Testing Laboratory Committee

ETF13  Battery Expert Working Group

DSH  resolution

PDSH  Interim Resolution

Reminder

Under certain specific circumstances, the IEC standard needs to make necessary elaboration, specification or further clarification, and form a CTL (temporary) resolution when necessary. It is recommended that you fully understand and implement the battery IEC standard and CTL (temporary) resolution based on the above discussion.

ZRLK has focused on battery product testing and certification for 15 years, always paying attention to changes in national laws and regulations, and providing customers with one-stop testing and certification services to ensure that your products quickly enter the target market. If you have batteries and battery-containing consumer smart products that need to be tested and certified, please feel free to contact us, our engineers will serve you as soon as possible!

Related Articles
  • How do smart desk lamps pass CE certification? ZRLK is your escort

  • Sodium battery UN38.3 certification: a key link to ensure product safety and compliance

  • CCC certification points of large capacity charging box: battery, headphones can not be less

  • CCC certification of the earphone charging case: The rated capacity of the battery cell is less than 600mAh.

Follow Us
国产91免费在线观看| 中文字幕日产无码| 欧美性xxxxx极品少妇| 久久91精品国产一区二区三区| 中文字幕av无码不卡免费| 人人做人人妻人人精| 人妻少妇被猛烈进入中文字幕 | 国产精品久久777777换脸| 日本欧美中文字幕| 青青草国产在线观看| 日韩第三页| 亚洲AV成人无码久久精品老人熟| 亚洲欧美日韩v中文在线| 久热这里只有精品63| 国产性一交一乱一伦一色一情| 日本九九热在线观看官网| 久久国产热精品波多野结衣av| jk美女自慰喷水| 国产精品视频一区| 国产主播一区二区三区在线观看| 国产精品多P对白交换绿帽| 少妇高潮太爽了在线观看欧美| 亚洲精品国产A久久久久久| 天堂新版在线资源| 欧美《熟妇的荡欲》未删减版 | xxxxx做受大片视频免费| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区好看电影| 麻麻丰满的大屁股| 熟妇人妻无乱码中文字幕真矢织江| 欧美大肥婆bbbww| 亚洲av无码片vr一区二区三区| 久久久久亚洲精品中文字幕| 精品人妻大屁股白浆无码| 国产亚洲精品美女久久久久| 伊人一区二区在线| 亚洲精品无码成人久久| 久久黄色网站| 亚洲欧美不卡高清在线观看| 欧美爆乳乱妇高清免费| 亚洲avav天堂av在线网爱情| 精品国产乱码一区二区三区|